of dating divorced - Chantal degroat lying bitch

However, : I edited out the "nipplectomy" and breast-feeding for my personal version.Actually, it wasn't so much the nipplectomy which bothered me (I've watched others, and enjoyed them), but the overall tone of this scene.It was the strength of her performance that was the best part of the film.

When it turns from torture to gore, I lose interest. Jane wrote me that they discussed JJ's character talking more in this one, but he noticed that she became even more disconcerted by his not talking.

The erotic value disappears for me at the point where the victim is, say, spurting blood from severed arteries. She said she was actually freaked out during the shooting because of this because she really believed this guy was a psycho.

If so, what elements contribute to this, or alternatively, prevent this from occurring? Although I am disappointed when a scene I expect to be arousing ends up disturbing me, I'm also fascinated by the reasons why. By my count, I posted 98 pictures of Jane over the past couple months.

Sometimes, all I can come up with is that it is "too real", but I'm sure there is more to it than just that. Of course, she sent me over 1700 stills to work with, so I didn't run everything, but 98 is plenty in my book. We don't really know anything about the Fantom, and he's punishing Jane because...hell, because she's hot? It's definitely a dream-like film, it was experimental and I applaud Jane and company for taking it on.

But hell, the board has been slow and no one is saying much of anything, so let's try to get some dialogue started.

We can't very well be the "World's Finest" blog when we get 3 posts a day, can we?

Can you think of a particular film/scene that went too far for you? All my fantasies have some degree of realism, but to agree with Yik Yakker, it would have to be excessive blood and gore. Kelley as inspiration for scripts for the new WW show he's doing. That while the female character is in distress with a crotchrope splitting her, the real actress is OK with it. Yik Yakker - is that an elaborate torture device or is she appearing in some vile Brazilian version of "Road Warrior"? When I posted the review of FA 318 which was quite favorable it was exciting that there was a part 2 which was promptly ordered - due to my flawed thought process I made the assumption it would be a continuation of part 1, perhaps in the vein of the "Slave Island" series - but oh nay nay - there is no connection at all - the setting, time period, uniforms, villains and premise make it an utterly different movie and leaves me wondering how it came to be part 2 - and there is not one bit of bondage or torment in it - so if you have an irresistable impulse to watch a bunch of dudes in military uniform holding down and raping a bunch of chicks in military uniform then this is for you - I found it a yawn fest unworthy of review. I have seen in various Yahoo groups images of great brutality, decapitation, vivisection, things that if they were real would lead to the death penalty being imposed, yet these are supposed to be erotic. Sloth: That fa-pro "sequel" you ordered sounds like something more similar to Battlefield Gangbang, which was reviewed by me.

Anything that detracts from the victim's beauty or is shown to be permanent can be a turn-off. When Trixie got her face beaten to a bloody pulp in ZFX's Ballista 2, I thought it was hot. This speaks to a point that I've noticed, and probably others have noticed, as well.

I could live with many of the of the other issues mentioned in the review - the blindfold, the mechanical whipping, the unenthusiastic villain, etc.

- and although I prefer the Red Feline films which feature blood and wound effects, I'd be willing to do without them if the rest of the video grabbed me.

Is there a point where GIMP scenes lose their entertainment value because they are too realistic?

Tags: , ,